Welcome to The Bug Genie
Please fill in your username and password below, and press "Continue" to log in.If you have not already registered, please use the "Register new account" tab to do so.
Please wait while updating issue type...
Could not save your changes
This issue has been changed since you started editing it
Data that has been changed is highlighted in red below. Undo your changes to see the updated information
You have changed this issue, but haven't saved your changes yet. To save it, press the Save changes button to the right
This issue is blocking the next release
There are no comments
There is nothing attached to this issue
This issue has no duplicates
There are no code checkins for this issue |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Really delete this comment?
Really delete this comment?
I think open is not the right way to treat importing of this. Traditionally "open" opens a document into its own instance. What you're talking about is opening into another already open document, ie importing.
In my opinion there should be two ways to import, linking to the original file or appending to include the file content into the current file.
I have started a forum topic on this but not yet an feature request here at the tracker. (http://synfig.org/forums/viewtopic.php?f=14&t=3426&p=14282&hilit=append#p14282)
Really delete this comment?
My suggestion is that after moving SVG import to File-> Open it will be changed to create new document instance as soon as you call it. Like this: user chooses File-> Open, selects SVG file and clicks open. Then the new document is created with the contenst of SVG file inserted there.
Another evolution of this idea might be allowing to open images too. I.e. you can link image to currently active document (via File -> Import), or you can open image (via File -> Open - that results in creating the new synfig document instance, with width & height corresponding to image, and imported image right to size there).
About the "Import" menu item: I agree its name is a bit off. "Link" is more suitable for that. Talking about overall Synfig terminology - there are many places where it should be reviewed and changed.
Really delete this comment?
I plan to remove the C/C++ SVG importer in the future: the code has become too difficult to maintain. My python Inkscape extension can actually be run as a standalone script (still requires Inkscape, though), so if lack of built-in SVG import turns out to be a huge problem we should be able to work something out.
My choice of an alternative name for the "Import" menu option would be "Place" or "Place Image" (borrowed from In Design).
Really delete this comment?
Imported User wrote: